TL;DR
A progressive web app (PWA) is a website that can be installed like an app. A native app is built separately for iOS and Android and shipped through their stores.
A PWA is cheaper because it is one codebase instead of two. How much cheaper, nobody on page 1 has measured: of 22 pages comparing the two, 6 put a percentage on the saving and none says where it came from, except one that misquotes its source.
The claim most worth checking is push notifications. iOS has supported them for installed web apps since March 2023, and some pages still say it does not.
Key Takeaways
- The saving is real and unmeasured. Of 22 pages comparing PWAs and native apps, MVP Development found 6 that give a percentage and 0 that measured it.
- All six figures overlap at one point. Every headline range includes 50%, so “about half” is the number nobody on page 1 disputes. Nobody tested it either.
- The only attributed figure is misquoted. It says 30 to 75% and credits an agency whose page says 30% to 70%.
- iOS push works, with a condition. Apple added Web Push for Home Screen web apps in iOS 16.4, released 27 March 2023. Of 12 pages that address it, 2 say it does not exist.
- The store fee is usually 15%, not 30%. Four pages quote “15 to 30%”. Apple and Google both offer most small developers a 15% rate.
What a PWA is, and what it is not
A PWA is a web app with three additions: it can be added to a phone’s home screen, it can work offline through a service worker, and it can send push notifications. It runs in the browser engine, loads from a URL, and updates the moment you deploy.
It is not a native app in a wrapper. That is a hybrid app, and the choice between a hybrid and a fully native build is a separate decision, covered under native vs cross-platform in the mobile app MVP guide.
For an MVP, the practical difference comes down to four things: how users install it, what it can reach on the phone, whether you can notify users, and who takes a share of your revenue.
PWA vs native app at a glance
| PWA | Native app | |
|---|---|---|
| Codebases | One, for every platform | One per platform, or one cross-platform codebase |
| Install | From the browser, no store | From the App Store or Google Play |
| Updates | Live on deploy | Through store review |
| Push on iOS | Yes since iOS 16.4, once added to the Home Screen | Yes |
| Device access | Camera, location and more; Bluetooth and NFC limited, especially on iOS | Full |
| Store fee on digital sales | None | 15% for most small developers who qualify |
| Found through | Search and links | Store search and links |
What a PWA saves: the numbers
Across 22 pages comparing PWAs and native apps, MVP Development found 6 that put a percentage on how much less a PWA costs, and none that measured it. Read 25 September 2026.
The six headline ranges, one per page: Neodigit says 40 to 60% less. MG Software says 40 to 60 percent. Tsoden says 30 to 50%. Newly says 30 to 50% on one page and 50 to 70% on another. ZTABS says 40 to 60% to build and maintain.
The synthesis is simple. Every one of those ranges includes 50%, so if you want the figure nobody on page 1 argues with, a PWA costs about half as much. Treat it as consensus, not evidence: none of the six shows how it was measured.
Only one of the six names a source. Newly writes that “according to research from Glance, PWA development is generally 30-75% less expensive.” Glance’s page says “anywhere from 30% to 70%”, never 75%, and Glance is a UK app agency describing its own project prices rather than a study.
Why a PWA is cheaper is not in doubt. One codebase replaces two, one release replaces two store submissions, and one team maintains it. The percentage depends on how much of your app needs the phone’s hardware, which is the part a PWA cannot reach.
Push notifications on iOS: the claim most pages get wrong
Apple added Web Push for web apps added to the Home Screen in iOS and iPadOS 16.4. WebKit’s Safari 16.4 release post is dated 27 March 2023, and the notifications appear on the Lock Screen and in Notification Center like any other app’s.
Of 22 pages comparing PWAs and native apps, MVP Development found 12 that say anything about push on iOS. Eight say it works. Two say it is limited without saying how. Two say it does not exist. Read 25 September 2026.
The two that say it does not exist were both written or updated after it shipped. NewStore’s comparison, published February 2024, lists push notifications on iOS as “Not available”. Topflight’s, updated January 2026, lists “No push notifications” among the things iOS PWAs cannot do.
The condition matters more than the date. WebKit says a Home Screen web app can ask for permission only “in response to direct user interaction”, and push works only once the user has installed it. Of the 8 pages saying iOS push works, 3 mention that it needs the Home Screen install.
For an MVP, that means push is available on iOS, but only to users you have already persuaded to install. If your product lives or dies on notifying people who have not installed anything, that is an argument for native.
The app store fee: 15%, not 30%
Four of the 22 pages give the app store commission, and all four give it as “15 to 30%”. None mentions the 15% rate most small developers qualify for.
Apple’s App Store Small Business Program offers “a reduced commission rate of 15%” to developers earning up to $1 million a year. Google says that of developers subject to a Play service fee, “99% are eligible for a fee of 15% or less”.
So for a startup that qualifies, the store fee a PWA avoids is about 15% of digital sales, not 30%. Apple’s rate needs enrollment in its program. For users in the US, UK and EEA, Google’s page lists a 10% service fee plus a 5% billing fee on the first $1 million of annual earnings, from 30 June 2026. It applies only to digital goods and subscriptions sold inside the app, and it is a real cost only once there is revenue.
When a PWA is the right MVP
- Your users arrive from the web. Search, links and ads land on a URL. A PWA is already there, with no store page in between.
- You are testing demand, not building the final product. One codebase that ships on every platform is the cheapest honest test. The build vs buy logic applies: spend the budget on the part that is your product.
- You will change it weekly. Updates go live on deploy, with no review queue.
- The phone’s hardware is incidental. Camera and location work. Bluetooth, NFC and heavy background work are where PWAs fall short, particularly on iOS.
- You sell digital subscriptions. Outside the store, the 15% commission does not apply.
When to build native instead
- The product is the hardware access. Bluetooth devices, NFC, health sensors or heavy background processing need native code.
- You must reach users who have not installed anything. iOS web push needs a Home Screen install first.
- Your audience searches the App Store. Some categories are found there, not on Google.
- Performance is the product. Games, AR and heavy media are native territory.
If native wins, the next decision is fully native or cross-platform. The React Native MVP and Flutter MVP guides cover the two main cross-platform routes, and the mobile app MVP guide covers scoping and cost.
What these figures are not
- Not a measurement of what a PWA saves. The study counts what pages claim and whether they source it. It does not test the saving, and says so.
- Not a personalised SERP. The 22 pages are the union of three search result sets for this query, read 25 September 2026. One page returned an error and one forum thread was excluded. Both are named in the dataset.
- Two pages from one publisher. Newly has two comparison pages in the sample and they disagree with each other, 30 to 50% on one and 50 to 70% on the other. Both are counted.
- What went wrong first. The first extractor found 3 claims across 22 pages, because most sit in tables. The second picked up JavaScript as claims. Every figure above was read against its page by a person.
How to cite these figures
Free to quote with attribution.
> Across 22 pages comparing PWAs and native apps, MVP Development found 6 that put a percentage on how much less a PWA costs and none that measured it; of 12 that address push notifications on iOS, 2 say they are unavailable, though Apple added them in iOS 16.4 in March 2023 (read 25 September 2026). https://mvpdevelopment.company/blog/pwa-vs-native-app
The dataset, with every quote and every correction: PWA claims study.
Related guides
- Mobile app MVP, scoping, cost and native vs cross-platform
- React Native MVP, one codebase compiled to native
- Flutter MVP, the other main cross-platform route
- Build vs buy software, what to build and what to rent
- MVP tech stack, choosing the rest of the stack
- What an MVP costs, the build budget in full
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between a PWA and a native app?
A PWA is a website that can be installed to the home screen, work offline and send push notifications, built once for every platform. A native app is built for iOS and Android specifically and installed from their app stores, with full access to the phone’s hardware.
Is a PWA cheaper than a native app?
Yes, because one codebase replaces two. Of 22 pages comparing them, 6 put a percentage on the saving, every one of their ranges includes 50%, and none shows how it was measured. Read 25 September 2026. Treat “about half” as consensus, not evidence.
Do PWAs support push notifications on iOS?
Yes, since iOS and iPadOS 16.4, released 27 March 2023, for web apps the user has added to the Home Screen. The permission request must follow a direct user action such as a tap. Some comparison pages written after that date still say iOS PWAs cannot receive push.
Can a PWA be listed in the App Store?
A PWA is installed from the browser, so it does not need a store listing. If you need to be found in the App Store, that is one of the main reasons to build native, or to package the app for the store with a cross-platform framework.
How much do app stores charge compared with a PWA?
Apple offers 15% to developers earning up to $1 million a year who join its Small Business Program, and Google says 99% of developers subject to its fee pay 15% or less. A PWA selling outside the stores pays neither, only its payment processor’s fee.
Should my MVP be a PWA or a native app?
A PWA, if users reach you from the web, you are still testing demand, and the product does not depend on hardware such as Bluetooth or NFC. Native, if the hardware is the product, you must notify users who have not installed anything, or your audience finds apps in the store.
Sources and references
- WebKit, “WebKit Features in Safari 16.4”, 27 March 2023: https://webkit.org/blog/13966/webkit-features-in-safari-16-4/
- WebKit, “Web Push for Web Apps on iOS and iPadOS”, 16 February 2023: https://webkit.org/blog/13878/web-push-for-web-apps-on-ios-and-ipados/
- Apple, App Store Small Business Program: https://developer.apple.com/app-store/small-business-program/
- Google Play Console Help, service fees: https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-developer/answer/112622
- Glance, “How Much Cheaper Is It to Build a PWA Compared to a Native App?”: https://thisisglance.com/learning-centre/how-much-cheaper-is-it-to-build-a-pwa-compared-to-a-native-app
- MVP Development, PWA claims study, read 25 September 2026: dataset





